Authors are invited to submit original, unpublished research work, as well as industrial practice reports. Simultaneous submission to other publication venues is not permitted. In accordance with CSEA policy, submitted manuscripts will be checked for plagiarism.
As the designated correspondence author, you will then receive a first e-mail message containing the paper ID. Please note that in order to ensure the fairness of the review process, CSEA follows the double-blind review procedure. Papers will be selected based on their originality, significance, relevance, and clarity of presentation assessed by at least two reviewers. The review results will be sent to the authors indicated on the submitted articles by emails. Please look out for the emails from the conference secretary.
you wish to submit a paper to CSEA 2022, please use the
following Online submission System.
and Publication Instructions:
Conference papers need to be prepared according to
conference proceedings format.
Paper Formatting Template
The Committees of CSEA 2022
efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the
conference and organising the sessions to enable the
participants to gain maximum benefit.
By submitting a paper to CSEA 2022
, the authors agree
to the review process and understand that papers undergo
a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by
appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by
the Conference Committee, who will give detailed
comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the
authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that
takes into account this feedback.
All papers are reviewed using a single-blind review
process: authors declare their names and affiliations in
the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers
do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors
receive information about who has reviewed their
The degree to which the paper deals with the above
issues is fundamental to a successful review and
selection of the paper. The most frequent cause of
rejections of submitted papers is a lack of new results.
Duplicated submissions to concurrent conferences must be
avoided. All submissions will be reviewed by the Program
Committee on the basis of technical quality, relevance
to scope of the conference, originality, significance,
Accepted papers will be published in the conference
proceedings. All manuscripts are submitted as full
papers and are reviewed based on their scientific merit.
The reviewing process is confidential. All paper
submissions will be carefully reviewed by TPC experts
and reviews will be returned to the author(s) with
comments to ensure the high quality of the accepted
papers. The accepted papers must be revised, taking into
consideration the referees' comments and suggestions,
before inclusion in the conference proceedings.
By submitting a manuscript to CSEA 2022
acknowledge that it has not been previously published or
accepted for publication in substantially similar form
in any peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible
papers, including journals, conferences, workshops, or
other peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no
paper substantially similar in content has been or will
be submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or
workshop with publicly accessible papers during the
review period. The authors also attest that they did not
submit a substantially similar submission to CSEA 2022
As a rule of thumb, the CSEA 2022
contain no more than 20 percent of material from
previous publications. Violation of any of these
conditions will lead to rejection.
is utterly intolerant of plagiarism.
Submitted papers are expected to contain original work
executed by the authors with adequate, proper and
scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job
of the authors to clearly identify both their own
contribution(s) and also published results / techniques
on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to
ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism,
the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article
from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s)
and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate
overseeing office of academic ethics and research
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the
title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated
institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the